Dual-licensing it as the copyright holder (this is perfectly legal by the way) under an additional, unspecified license may open quite the can of worms. Another part was the idea to dual-license the project, which currently stands under the GNU General Public License version 2.
I haven’t studied the issues in detail, but most of the outrage seems to center around a new privacy policy which included all kinds of telemetry data collection plus some Google Analytics integration. A short while ago there’s been quite a fuzz about the free and open source audio editor going all spyware on users, quickly spawning a set of forks to run away to after the acquired the project.
0 kommentar(er)
